Residents must pursue private litigation to resolve records disputes.Īrkansas has no state entity that adjudicates complaints about alleged open meetings or open records law violations. Residents can ask the attorney general or their county attorney to file a lawsuit to enforce open meetings laws, but these offices can’t file lawsuits to enforce public records law. But it does not have authority to force agency compliance. The Arizona Ombudsman-Citizens’ Aide does receive complaints about public records and meeting access, and the agency can answer questions, mediate between complainants and agencies, and formally investigate complaints. Generally, Arizona residents must go to court to resolve open government disputes. ![]() The ombudsman can make recommendations and publish its findings, but it has no authority to enforce compliance. If an open government dispute involves a state agency, residents can file a complaint with the Alaska State Ombudsman, which can investigate. The Alabama attorney general generally does not play a significant role in enforcing state open government laws.Īlaska residents’ only option for formally resolving complaints about alleged violations of state public records or open meetings law is to sue. ![]() In Alabama, the only avenue for resolving complaints about alleged violations of state public records or open meetings law is to file a lawsuit. Here is a state-by-state breakdown of the mechanisms for resolving open government disputes across the U.S. In most states, the only meaningful option for residents to resolve complaints about agencies wrongfully withholding public records is to file costly lawsuits.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |